If anyone knows any advantages of this File Search Utility, relative to Spotlight or EasyFind, I’d be interested to hear about it. It has the advantage of not being limited by a fixed database that gets updated periodically (like Spotlight), so it’s slower but will search everything in real time.Īlso, because the Mac is really Unix under the hood, and I know regular expressions, I can grep stuff in the Mac’s Terminal (command-line) program, running bash. When Spotlight isn’t enough, and I want more fine-grained control of a search, I use EasyFind, a powerful and free search program. (For those of you not familiar with the Mac, “Finder” is a misleading name - it’s the Mac’s file manager, like Windows Explorer, not actually a program to find stuff itself.) The advanced mode (with more options) can be run by typing command-option-spacebar that lets you search in any Finder window, against a particular folder or the entire Mac, and lets you save “smart search” virtual folders in the Finder’s sidebar that update themselves base on the criteria you specify. The simple mode, which is good enough for most purposes, is enabled by typing command-spacebar. Most people just use the built-in Spotlight utility, which has a couple of different modes it can run in. On the Mac, there are about a gazillion programs for finding stuff, some free. for any remnants of the program, and delete any files or folders you find. Do any Linux mavens know whether Btrfs, which supports “instant” snapshots, also inherently supports instant file indexing and makes instant file searches possible with utilities that know how to harness that functionality? In other words, if I switched to Btrfs (which apparently still has some performance downsides and edge-case problems), would I get much faster file searches with the right search utilities? Sometimes, software problems occur because critical application files have. PS: I’m still a Linux beginner and I use the Ext4 file system. But File Search Utility looks like it might be worth trying as a substitute for Agent Ransack, so thanks for the heads-up, Martin! I’m all about minimizing hassle and the need for recurring tweaks, so that wouldn’t be my cup of tea. I’m probably *not* going to try rlocate, because installing rlocate involves insmoding the kernel, which I assume is something that would have to be done every time there is a kernel update. To be fair, I haven’t yet tried Recoll, which supposedly supports real-time indexing. It was a good idea, I guess - but not much about the keys to get it working. How about that weird little piece of music you put on the piano - I need the key, I can play there We were stuck on the map and I asked to have the keys made. In any case, we got it and we can go back and use it. In Linux … I’m waiting for Everything’s developer to port Everything to Linux! But seriously, in the meantime I’m using Drill in AppImage format and Catfish from the repo, and either I’m really bad at configuring and using them or they’re just not as good. town lone urn on this map - we couldnt find it. (Agent Ransack was just updated a few days ago for the first time in years.) You can use TextCrawler in commercial and non-commercial settings. In Windows, I use Everything to find files by name because of its unparalleled speed, and Agent Ransack to find files by content because of its easier user interface and (to me) simpler arguments. TextCrawler is a little different than most regular file search tools, as it focuses on text.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |